Timeline for Should we allow question about the developers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/ with https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.bitcoin.stackexchange.com/ with https://bitcoin.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Sep 1, 2011 at 18:49 | comment | added | David Perry | If only there were a "this question is stupid" option to close. Would that qualify better as "not a question" or "not constructive"? | |
Sep 1, 2011 at 11:00 | comment | added | David Schwartz | How is "Is Satoshi involved with the CIA" any better or worse than "Are Bitcoins poisonous"? They're both stupid questions, but it's because they're asking if made up nonsense is true, not because questions about Satoshi Nakamoto are off-topic. | |
Aug 31, 2011 at 22:13 | comment | added | David Perry | The problem is that we won't have a few Satoshi questions. When you have a "mysterious figure" like this involved in anything so potentially disruptive as Bitcoin, we are going to get a constant influx of Satoshi questions. If we consider "Is Satoshi involved with CIA" to be different than "Is Satoshi involed with FBI" (which it technically is) this will quickly cease to be bitcoin.stackexchange.com and become satoshi.stackexchange.com. We MUST have stronger moderation than the forums. No tinfoil hats, no politics, no chitchat. | |
Aug 31, 2011 at 22:09 | comment | added | Flow | I get your point. But how can something be off topic if it's allowed in another question? So the question would be, do we wan't to merge everything, for example, satoshi related in one big question? I don't see how having a few separate questions about satoshi around is any worse than having one big one. In fact, I think it's the better and clear solution. | |
Aug 31, 2011 at 22:02 | history | answered | David Perry | CC BY-SA 3.0 |