1

This question has what seems to be a useful title, and in fact the answer provided does answer that question. However, the body of the question goes off on a tangent that is going to be unhelpful to most people.

Should the question be rephrased to just ask about what message signing does in the Bitcoin client?

1
  • I edited the question that reflects the title better, while still expressing author's doubts that turn out to be irrelevant. I hope that it is more suitable now. If it later turns out that the question should be handled differently, we can always roll back the edit.
    – ThePiachu
    Jun 15, 2012 at 1:16

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2

I think the message body should be changed to reflect the useful title more strongly, but at the same time try to contain the doubts raised by the question author in the body.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .