I think it would be benefical to tag services (current or future/proposed) layers of the Bitcoin network accordingly.

One example is this question where I ask about a P2P anonymous rating system. This relates to Bitcoin in technology, but is layered above the base protocol/technology.


1 Answer 1


The only name for such services I could think of currently is "Bitcoin Ecosystem", a term I started using in my master thesis. However, I don't think such a general tag would be too beneficial, whatever it would be. Trying to establish a convention top-down might not work too well if there isn't any work going from bottom-up. So I would argue to just let everyone tag their question how they please, and if we see some tag emerging and being useful, we could try incorporating more question to it.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .