1

I'm currently at Scaling Bitcoin in the "Scaling Community Workshop".

One of the points that has come up as a potential solution for improving online discourse is "Fact-Checking".

Do you think that Bitcoin.Stackexchange.com could be a good platform for this sort of information?

Discuss!

  • Fact checking on what exactly? – Waqar Lim Oct 9 '16 at 7:37
  • Evidence people are sourcing for their discussion contributions. – Murch Oct 9 '16 at 13:16
4

I think it's fine to ask questions like "Is it true that...?", if you want evidence to confirm or refute some claim. But with the usual caveats:

  • Volume: Please try not to ask a gigantic number of questions in a short time. Prioritize those that are of broad interest, or have unusual features that need specific expertise; don't just ask a question for every single thing that anyone says.

  • Justification: Give some explanation as to why the question is interesting, and/or who claimed it was true.

  • Research effort: Make a reasonable attempt to answer the question for yourself first. If you don't find the answer, then you can ask here, but include a summary of what you already tried, to save time for potential answerers. (If you do find the answer, then you could post a question with answer, if you think it is something that will be of interest to others.)

  • Standards: Try to make it clear what kind of evidence you would like answers to include. An expert's opinion? Blog posts? Peer-reviewed articles? References to source code? This will avoid answerers being frustrated when they work hard on something that isn't what you were looking for.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .